A Critical Analysis of the Political and Social Demands of the Constitutionalists of Urmia: Focusing on the Faryad Newspaper
Pages 6-22
https://doi.org/10.30481/psa.2026.567211.1113
mohsen momeni, tohid melikzade,
Abstract Abstract In the early twentieth century, the constitutional movement in Iran sought to establish justice and promote a more equitable distribution of political power within Qajar society. This transnational movement, which had precipitated far-reaching political and social transformations in the Ottoman Empire, various Asian polities, and even Russia, likewise engendered significant structural changes in Iran’s political order, the configuration of power, and the institutionalization of the rule of law. Amid these transformations, the lack of consensus among popular demands, coupled with the ruling elite’s resistance to curtailing its absolutist authority, gave rise to armed confrontations that escalated into a civil conflict between the constitutionalists and the forces of the state. These conflicts, in turn, marginalized the foundational principles of constitutionalism. The key contributions of this study are threefold: (1) introducing the Faryad newspaper, which was published in Urmia during the Constitutional period; (2) examining the political and social demands articulated by Urmia’s elites during the Iranian Constitutional Revolution; and (3) tracing shifts in the political and social demands of Urmia’s political elites from the outset of the Constitutional movement through the end of the Faryad newspaper’s publication. Employing a descriptive-analytical approach, this study seeks to identify and elucidate the demands of the constitutionalists of Urmia through a content analysis of articles published in the Faryad newspaper. The main research questions are as follows: Based on the contents of the Faryad newspaper, what political and social demands were articulated by the constitutionalists of Urmia? How did the demands of the constitutionalists of Urmia evolve over the course of the Constitutional movement? The findings indicate that, from the outset of the Constitutional movement, the people of Urmia, like other communities across Azerbaijan and Iran, articulated demands for freedom, liberty, national rights, and related political and social aspirations. These demands were reflected in the pages of the Faryad newspaper published in Urmia. Over time, however, as state authority weakened and borderland tribal groups became increasingly restive, the constitutionalists’ demands in Urmia gradually receded in priority, giving way to more immediate popular concerns. The preservation of security consequently emerged as the foremost priority among their demands. Introduction Urmia, the second-largest city in Azerbaijan, experienced a period of considerable political and social upheaval during the Constitutional Revolution. The Faryad newspaper, the first reputable nationalist publication in Urmia, played a significant role in disseminating the modern political and social ideas of the time. Urmia was the first city in the Qajar domains to have its own newspaper, despite not being the provincial capital. The first issue of the newspaper was published on 21 Muharram 1325 AH / 14 Esfand 1285 SH, while its twenty-third and final issue appeared on 6 Dhu al-Qa'dah 1325 AH / 25 Tir 1286 SH. Following the bombardment of the Majles and the consolidation of power by state-backed opponents of the Constitutional movement, the Faryad newspaper, like other nationalist publications, ceased publication as the constitutional order was disrupted. For a considerable period, the central concern of numerous treatises, books, and periodicals was the Constitutional movement and the examination of its nature. In fact, the meaning of constitutionalism, its interpretation and explication, and even legal notions such as the demand for rights, the protection of rights, and dozens of other demands remained unclear in public forums, periodicals, and public discourse in the absence of a clear definition of its nature and mechanisms of implementation. Even interpretations and readings of constitutionalism varied across different regions, particularly in Azerbaijan, with Tabriz as its principal center and regional centers such as Rasht, Zanjan, Urmia, Ardabil, and Qazvin, in contrast to cities such as Isfahan. This was because Azerbaijani constitutionalism was, on the one hand, directly influenced by the two Social Democratic schools of thought in Baku and Tiflis, which drew their intellectual inspiration from Russia, and, on the other hand, was shaped by the ideas of the Ottoman Union and Progress movement. Research Questions: What were the principal demands of Urmia’s constitutionalists? How did these demands evolve, as reflected in the Faryad newspaper? More broadly, what did the people of Urmia seek during the Constitutional period? Research Methodology This study employs a qualitative historical approach, drawing primarily on archival issues of the Faryad newspaper and supplemented by relevant published library sources. Research Findings In the early twentieth century, the Constitutional movement and the idea of a more equitable distribution of power between the state and the nation gave rise to significant political and social transformations in Qajar Iran, the Ottoman Empire, and even Russia. In its early stages, constitutional discourse remained broad and relatively unspecific, centering on notions such as progress, prosperity, the protection of rights, welfare, security, reform, the establishment of the National Consultative Assembly, well-being, the interests of the state and the nation, the public good, and the major and essential needs of the people. In fact, principles and concepts such as constitutionalism, the demand for rights, the protection of rights, and dozens of other terms were repeatedly invoked in forums, associations, and periodicals, yet remained broadly formulated and undefined in terms of their practical mechanisms of implementation. Gradually, more complex demands articulated by both constitutionalists and secularists were incorporated into the discourse. In Azerbaijan, these demands found expression in other freedom-oriented formulations, including “herald of reform,” “advocate of progress,” “patriotism,” “freedom of expression,” and “love of the homeland,” as reflected in the Faryad newspaper. Threats from factions opposed to the armed struggle of Urmia’s constitutionalists led to a marked shift in the content of the Faryad newspaper from issue no. 13 onward. Unlike the earlier issues, its coverage thereafter contained few references to the principal demands and fundamental principles of constitutionalism. Instead, the newspaper largely focused on reports of border clashes with the Ottoman Empire and the ongoing confrontations and skirmishes between Kurdish tribal groups and the armed constitutionalist forces in western Azerbaijan. An examination of all 23 issues of the Faryad newspaper reveals that, amid these political and social transformations, several factors—including the lack of uniformity in popular demands, the ruling authorities’ resistance to curtailing their absolute power, armed conflicts that approached the scale of a civil war between the constitutionalists and government forces, tribal Kurdish uprisings, and the broader deterioration of security in western Azerbaijan, particularly in Urmia and Salmas—contributed to the marginalization of the initial principles of constitutionalism in the region.














